Firefighters Online - An online firefighting community, firefighting resource center and firefighting search engine for firefighters and emergency workers... Register for free access to our message forums, and join discussions on fireground operations, rescue, emergency services, fire department funding and more...


Search SEARCH:
Firefighters Online
Free Fire Magazines Site Map
Help
Contact Us
Contact Us
Terms
Privacy Policy
Sponsored Links

Hot Products »
1950 Ford Fire Department Step Van -  Scale 1:24
1950 Ford Fire Department Step Van - Scale 1:24
1938 Ford  Fire Engine - Scale 1:24
1938 Ford Fire Engine - Scale 1:24
1931 Ford Model A Fire Truck - Scale 1:18 9 inches
1931 Ford Model A Fire Truck - Scale 1:18 9 inches
1941 Ford Fire Truck - 1:16 Scale - White
1941 Ford Fire Truck - 1:16 Scale - White

Fireground Operations & Tactics » Technical Reports

Sodium Explosion Critically Burns Firefighters - (Newton, Massachusetts - October 25, 1993) » Key Issues

IssuesComments
Cause of ExplosionEmployees deviated from standard procedures by attempting to dispose of an excessive amount of residual sodium. The sodium overflowed and came in contact with water causing an explosion and fire.
Second ExplosionA second explosion occurred when firefighters were attempting to extinguish the residual fire from the first explosion. The firefighters were splashed with burning molten sodium.
CasualtiesEleven firefighters burned, two very critically, six others seriously. Two plant employees were also injured.
Risk Assessment The hazards of burning liquid sodium exceed the capabilities of the fire department. There is an extreme risk of explosion, extinguishing agents are ineffective, and protective clothing is inadequate.
Additional Hazard The use of the same enclosure to perform wet washing and to bum-off excess sodium created an unnecessary hazard. Sodium should never be handled in a location where there is any possibility of contact with water.
Action PlanResponding fire department personnel were not provided with essential information that should have been considered in the development of an action plan. A full evaluation of the risks and potential consequences of this incident would have resulted in the conclusion that the safe plan would have been to take no action.
Structural Protective ClothingStructural protective clothing and self-contained breathing apparatus are not designed to provide adequate protection for exposure to molten metal. There is no practical protective clothing for this hazard.
Proper Use of Protective ClothingMembers involved in the incident would have been better protected if they had been wearing full protective clothing ensembles that meet current standards and had used the chin straps on their helmets, pulled up 3/4 length boots, and (in one case) not worn a turnout coat without the liner.
CommunicationsWith ambulance radios set to police (dispatch) channel, heavy radio traffic interfered with the Incident Commander getting them into the scene to transport bum victims.
Molten MetalBums caused by molten metal are more severe than other types of bums, because the metal is extremely hot and impregnates protective clothing.

Next » Newton

ForumsFire DepartmentsRescueOps & TacticsWildfireDirectoryFire CareersFire NewsFirefighting AuctionsFirefighter Shop
Add to Favorites Save to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
© 2004 - 2008 Firefighters Online