Firefighters Online - An online firefighting community, firefighting resource center and firefighting search engine for firefighters and emergency workers... Register for free access to our message forums, and join discussions on fireground operations, rescue, emergency services, fire department funding and more...


Search SEARCH:
Firefighters Online
Free Fire Magazines Site Map
Help
Contact Us
Contact Us
Terms
Privacy Policy
Sponsored Links

Hot Products »
Red Hats of Courage Hero Trophy Bust
Red Hats of Courage Hero Trophy Bust
Red Hats of Courage Being of Service Plaque
Red Hats of Courage Being of Service Plaque
Red Hats of Courage Race to Stop! Clock
Red Hats of Courage Race to Stop! Clock
Red Hats of Courage Full Force
Red Hats of Courage Full Force

Fireground Operations & Tactics » Technical Reports

Sodium Explosion Critically Burns Firefighters - (Newton, Massachusetts - October 25, 1993) » Overview

Eleven firefighters were burned, six seriously, one critically, and one extremely critically, in an explosion that occurred while they were attempting to extinguish a sodium fire in a metals processing establishment in Newton, Massachusetts on October 25, 1993. The incident illustrates how quickly and unpredictably an apparently minor hazardous materials situation can change, with tragic consequences. It also shows how standard protective clothing and equipment, designed for structural fire fighting, is dangerously inadequate for a molten metals incident.

The situation was caused by a deviation from standard procedures for handling waste sodium at the facility. The incident provides an important series of lessons for all firefighters on the risks involved with sodium and other flammable metals and on the need to obtain reliable information from responsible individuals at hazardous materials incidents.

Fires in sodium and other water reactive metals are uncommon, and the circumstances of this incident are particularly unusual. Previous experience and pre-fire planning at the facility contributed to a false sense of security among the firefighters, who believed that the incident could be handled easily and without significant risk. Employees at the facility did not provide information that would have caused the officers in charge of the incident to more fully evaluate the risks of this particular situation before initiating action.

The analysis, which was conducted with the luxury of time and access to all available information and expertise, indicates that the action that was taken involved a high level of risk and resulted in the situation that is described. It must be recognized that these resources were not available to the individuals who had to face the situation as it was presented to them at the time. This report should not be interpreted as a criticism of the decisions that were made or the actions that were taken.

Next » Key Issues

ForumsFire DepartmentsRescueOps & TacticsWildfireDirectoryFire CareersFire NewsFirefighting AuctionsFirefighter Shop
Add to Favorites Save to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
© 2004 - 2008 Firefighters Online