| Issues | Comments |
| BUILDING FIRE PROTECTION | The automatic sprinkler system was overwhelmed by
the fire’s size and fuel supply. Early failure of two
large risers/supply mains diverted water from sprinklers
over the fire. Failed automatic sprinkler systems
were not promptly shut down to direct the water
to viable systems.
|
| WATER SUPPLY | The large on-site stored water supply was lost early
in the fire due to failure of the diesel engine driven
fire pumps. The city water system flowed directly
into the plant’s system and was taxed by flow from
over ten 8-inch collapsed automatic sprinkler risers
early in the fire. |
| PROCESS CONTROLS | Heat transfer system controls and emergency procedures
may not have been sufficient to prevent the
combustible heat transfer fluid from continuing to
feed the fire. |
| FIRE DOOR MAINTENANCE | Many rolling steel fire doors installed in masonry
walls between additions to the Complex reportedly
failed to close automatically or manually. The principle
failure mechanism was identified by fire department
and insurance company representatives as
pinched together guide tracks at the edges of these
doors. These sources also indicated that fire door and
other maintenance deficiencies had been discussed
with the plant management prior to the fire. |
| DELAYED ALARM | The direct fire alarm connection to the county 911
emergency center was placed out-of-service by the
plant. The purpose of doing this was to perform maintenance
on a sprinkler system riser that was in a section
of the plant away from the point of fire origin.
The first telephone report of the fire to the 911 emergency
center was from an in-plant location near the
loading dock. This was followed several minutes later
by a telephoned report from the plant security office.
This demonstrated a lack of coordination between
plant security and maintenance functions which
should have determined that the initial water flow
alarm was not from the sprinkler riser being repaired. |
| CONVEYOR OPENINGS | Several large conveyor openings through fire separation
walls were protected by deluge sprinklers. The
loss of water supply to these sprinklers early in the
fire rendered this protection inoperative. Smoke, hot
gases and eventually the fire were able to travel
through these openings because of the lack of water
spray and fire doors. |
| PRE-INCIDENT PLANNING | The fire department reported visiting the plant in early
1994 as a new carpet manufacturing process was starting-
up and that the Fire Prevention Bureau was well
equipped with drawings, blueprints and pre-fire plans.
Company familiarization tours and comprehensive fire
prevention visits probably had not been conducted
since that time. Plant knowledge and familiarization is
a continuous undertaking for all fire department members.
At a senior level, planning should also include an
analysis of what might occur if a fire protection feature,
such as the automatic sprinklers, fails. |
| MULTIPLE ALARMS | The Milliken fire was a third alarm incident that
included recall of off-duty LaGrange firefighters and
mutual aid from other towns and county resources.
The LaGrange Fire Department has procedural
guidelines for equipment responses to confirmed
structure fires through the third alarm which would
provide a total of 12 engines, 4 trucks and 3 squads.
However, the guidelines do not identify the source
and units of mutual aid equipment responding on the
various alarms. Based upon interviews, the number
of fire apparatus that were operating at the scene was
less than the preplanned response. |
Next » Building History and Occupancy